Fraud and Misrepresentation in Oregon Business Deals: What You Need to Prove

Two professionals in formal attire reviewing documents and a tablet in an office setting.

Parties typically enter business deals based on representations they make to one another about various important facts. However, business transactions can sour when one party accuses the other of fraud or misrepresentation of a material fact. But when a fraud or misrepresentation claim arises in the context of a business deal, what does the alleging party need to prove their claim? 

Fraud vs. Misrepresentation in Business Law

Although related, fraud and misrepresentation in business law cover different aspects of misconduct in a transaction. Fraud occurs when a party intentionally or knowingly makes a false statement to deceive a counterparty or knows that the statement will deceive the counterparty to their detriment. However, misrepresentation can cover a broader scope of conduct. Misrepresentation, which involves false or misleading statements or omissions, can occur intentionally, with a conscious disregard of the veracity (or lack thereof) of statements, or without due care to ascertain the veracity of statements. 

The Elements of Fraud Under Oregon Law

A business fraud claim requires a party to prove several elements to win a case for compensation or other relief. These elements include:

  • A false representation of a material fact (a fact that would tend to affect a reasonable party’s decisions or actions)
  • Knowledge of the falsity of that fact (“scienter”)
  • Intent to induce a counterparty’s reliance on the fact or knowledge that the party will rely on that fact
  • Justifiable reliance on the fact (the counterparty must not have reason to know or suspect the falsity of the representation)
  • Losses directly and proximately caused by the false representation

The “Clear and Convincing Evidence” Standard

While most civil claims require a party to prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence (“more likely than not”), a fraud claim has a higher standard of proof. A party asserting a fraud claim must prove their case by “clear and convincing” evidence. This standard requires a plaintiff to have substantial evidence showing that a defendant engaged in fraudulent behavior. Such evidence may include communications, witness testimony, and documents directly contradicting representations.

What Constitutes Misrepresentation in an Oregon Business Deal?

Misrepresentation can occur over a broader set of circumstances than fraud in a business deal. Whereas fraud requires knowledge or intent, a party may commit a misrepresentation recklessly or negligently, without a conscious intent to deceive a counterparty or knowledge that a representation will deceive the counterparty. 

Common Fraud and Misrepresentation Scenarios in Business Transactions

Fraud or misrepresentation claims may arise in various aspects of a business deal. Some of the most common examples of fraudulent conduct or misrepresentations in transactions include:

  • Providing false financial statements during due diligence
  • Misrepresenting business financial data
  • Failing to disclose existing liens or liabilities
  • Failing to disclose future or contingent liabilities
  • False statements about capability to perform contractual requirements

Remedies for Fraud or Misrepresentation

A court can award various remedies when a party proves a fraud or misrepresentation claim in a business transaction. Common remedies include:

  • Rescission (canceling the contract and putting the parties back in their pre-transaction positions)
  • Direct damages (the value of the promised performance)
  • Consequential damages (expenses or losses that flow from the fraud or misrepresentation)
  • Punitive damages (for malicious behavior or a conscious disregard of highly unreasonable risk of harm), although a portion of punitive damages go to the state in Oregon
Hand holding digital icons representing justice, law, time, and collaboration on dark background.

Contact Our Firm Today for Experienced Representation in Business Litigation

Fraud or misrepresentation in a business deal may entitle an innocent party to seek compensation or other relief for losses caused by the conduct. Contact Wayne A. Lamb Law today for a case evaluation with a business litigation attorney to learn more about fraud and misrepresentation in business deals and discuss how our firm can help you protect your financial interests if a counterparty engaged in misconduct in your business deal or if they accuse you of engaging in fraud or misrepresentation.